Cover work for today
Complete the prep activities and test yourself against which theorist for each video example
The write a 30 min timed response on paper hand in your books at the end of the lesson
Do not give yourself more than 6 mins per paragraph
Monday, 26 March 2018
Wednesday, 21 March 2018
4.5 Homework for next Wednesday 28th March
1. Re-write your essay from the exam into the correct structure - apply the feedback given to you
You will remark this next week
2. Complete the essay plan below with detail - you will write this up as a timed essay in the lesson next week
Question
|
Discuss the need for stricter media regulation
|
Identify key words
| |
Associate key words/key theories and debates
| |
Introduction
Answer the question
|
Summarise: Why is regulation necessary to protect the public
|
Who regulates, - there is no 1 regulator but different institutions, what types and what are the regulatory practices (reactive, proactive, statutory, self-regulating)
| |
What are SOME of the debates (freedom of individual or controlling population, protection, who’s responsibility – parents, media industry or government, conservative view of upholding moral standards, we have become desensitised so regulation is more liberal?)
| |
Summarise: What is your answer:
Which form needs to be stricter - is this the most popular?
What methods work best?
| |
Paragraph 2: The Past
| |
Point 1: Historic debates about the need for regulation
|
How well/strictly has it protected the public in the past?
|
What are the past debates about the need to regulate
| |
What is your opinion? Are you Active Audience or Passive?
Should there be appointed people in society who regulate* and is this elitism (‘class-ist’)?
| |
Example 1
Case Study
|
BBFC 1980s Video Nasties, 1945 BBF Censors to uphold moral standards, “for the masses by the few*”, Mary Whitehouse, Video Recordings Act (based on false research and theory)
|
Explanation
Theory
|
What theories support your response? Active Audience or Passive?
|
What theories go against - do you need to argue against?
| |
Conclusion
|
Compare how does this relate to contemporary current regulation – stricter or liberal in the past and was it effective
|
Paragraph 3: Contemporary Film Regulation
| |
Point 2:
BBFC
|
COMPARE - How effective/well does it protect the public now? How does the BBFC regulate – regulatory practices?
|
What are the debates about the need to regulate Film content (be specific here: sex, violence, horror, imitable behaviour, discrimination, controversial content – access to films illegally over the internet, parental responsibility?)
| |
What is your opinion?
| |
Example 2
Case Study
|
Either: Hatred, Blue is the Warmest Colour, Hunger Games or your own recent example
What is your view on this film – are you liberal or conservative/ Active Audience or Passive?
|
Explanation
Theory
|
What theories support your response?
|
What theories go against - do you need to argue against?
| |
Conclude how does this answer the question on contemporary current regulation is there a need to protect the public and is the BBFC effective with reasons why
|
Paragraph 4: Contemporary TV Regulation
| |
Point 2:
BBFC
|
COMPARE - How effective/well does it protect the public now? How does the OFCOM regulate – regulatory practices?
|
What are the debates about the need to regulate TV content (be specific here: sex, violence, imitable behaviour, discrimination, controversial content – access to footage on Youtube, catch up displaces Watershed?)
| |
What is your opinion?
| |
Example 2
Case Study
|
Either: Woolwich Terror Attack, Benefits Street or your own recent example
What is your view on this film – are you liberal or conservative/ Active Audience or Passive?
|
Explanation
Theory
|
What theories support your response?
|
What theories go against - do you need to argue against?
| |
Conclude how does this answer the question on contemporary current regulation is there a need to protect the public and is the OFCOM effective with reasons why
|
Paragraph 5: Social Media
| |
Point 2:
BBFC
|
COMPARE - How effective/well does it protect the public now? How does the Youtube or Twitter regulate – regulatory practices?
|
What are the debates about the need to regulate social media content (be specific here: sex, violence, imitable behaviour, discrimination, controversial content – access to footage on Youtube, catch up displaces Watershed?)
| |
What is your opinion?
| |
Example 2
Case Study
| |
Explanation
Theory
|
What theories support your response?
|
What theories go against - do you need to argue against?
| |
Conclude how does this answer the question on contemporary current regulation is there a need to protect the public and to be stricter effective with reasons why
|
Paragraph 6: Conclusion
| |
Conclusion
|
Summarise your point and restate your opinion to answer the question - choose one of the following to explain your prediction
What will Media Regulation look like in 10 years time?
1. No regulation at all – the public are educated and trusted to make their own decisions (like the internet and twitter), the internet and all media should be free
2. Highly strict regulation – invasive ‘Google is watching you’ and watches what you are doing and blocks you, stricter laws for parents that don’t take responsibility, the internet should be policed
3. There is 1 big regulator of all media
4. Broadcasters and Film companies and websites are trusted and expected to regulate their own media (so Twitter censors itself)
|
Wednesday, 14 March 2018
4.4 Homework for 21st March
Prep for Monday 19th March
Research the Case Study, completing the handout linked in the post below
Homework for 21st March:
Complete the following Essay Plan, writing in full sentences
Question
|
How well does contemporary media regulation protect the public?
|
Identify key words
| |
Associate key words/key theories and debates
| |
Introduction
Answer the question
|
Summarise: Why is regulation necessary to protect the public
|
Who regulates, - there is no 1 regulator but different institutions, what types and what are the regulatory practices (reactive, proactive, statutory, self-regulating)
| |
What are SOME of the debates (freedom of individual or controlling population, protection, who’s responsibility – parents, media industry or government, conservative view of upholding moral standards, we have become desensitised so regulation is more liberal?)
| |
Summarise: What is your answer:
Which is more effective stat or non, pro or reactive? Having different regulators?
Should the public be protected – who?
Who should regulate?
| |
Paragraph 2: The Past
| |
Point 1: Historic debates about the need for regulation
|
How well has it protected the public in the past?
|
What are the past debates about the need to regulate
| |
What is your opinion? Are you Active Audience or Passive?
Should there be appointed people in society who regulate* and is this elitism (‘class-ist’)?
| |
Example 1
Case Study
|
BBFC 1980s Video Nasties, 1945 BBF Censors to uphold moral standards, “for the masses by the few*”, Mary Whitehouse, Video Recordings Act (based on false research and theory)
|
Explanation
Theory
|
What theories support your response? Active Audience or Passive?
|
What theories go against - do you need to argue against?
| |
Conclusion
|
Compare how does this relate to contemporary current regulation – stricter or liberal in the past and was it effective
|
Paragraph 3: Contemporary Film Regulation
| |
Point 2:
BBFC
|
COMPARE - How effective/well does it protect the public now? How does the BBFC regulate – regulatory practices?
|
What are the debates about the need to regulate Film content (be specific here: sex, violence, horror, imitable behaviour, discrimination, controversial content – access to films illegally over the internet, parental responsibility?)
| |
What is your opinion?
| |
Example 2
Case Study
|
Either: Hatred, Blue is the Warmest Colour, Hunger Games or your own recent example
What is your view on this film – are you liberal or conservative/ Active Audience or Passive?
|
Explanation
Theory
|
What theories support your response?
|
What theories go against - do you need to argue against?
| |
Conclude how does this answer the question on contemporary current regulation is there a need to protect the public and is the BBFC effective with reasons why
|
Paragraph 4: Contemporary TV Regulation
| |
Point 2:
BBFC
|
COMPARE - How effective/well does it protect the public now? How does the OFCOM regulate – regulatory practices?
|
What are the debates about the need to regulate TV content (be specific here: sex, violence, imitable behaviour, discrimination, controversial content – access to footage on Youtube, catch up displaces Watershed?)
| |
What is your opinion?
| |
Example 2
Case Study
|
Either: Woolwich Terror Attack, Benefits Street or your own recent example
What is your view on this film – are you liberal or conservative/ Active Audience or Passive?
|
Explanation
Theory
|
What theories support your response?
|
What theories go against - do you need to argue against?
| |
Conclude how does this answer the question on contemporary current regulation is there a need to protect the public and is the OFCOM effective with reasons why
|
Paragraph 6: Conclusion
| |
Conclusion
|
Summarise your point and restate your opinion to answer the question - choose one of the following to explain your prediction
What will Media Regulation look like in 10 years time?
1. No regulation at all – the public are educated and trusted to make their own decisions (like the internet and twitter), the internet and all media should be free
2. Highly strict regulation – invasive ‘Google is watching you’ and watches what you are doing and blocks you, stricter laws for parents that don’t take responsibility, the internet should be policed
3. There is 1 big regulator of all media
4. Broadcasters and Film companies and websites are trusted and expected to regulate their own media (so Twitter censors itself)
|
Tuesday, 13 March 2018
FSA 3 Update Mock Exam
Due to time restrictions, tomorrows Mock Exam will be only the
Regulation Question.
Your PM3 will be the final coursework grade + regulation
We will do Q1b in class next week so that your revision will not be
wasted.
Thanks and apologies for confusion.
RB
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)