Monday, 29 February 2016

Week 21 OFCOM Case Study 1 Benefits Street

Objective: to examine the social changes and arguments surrounding the regulation of TV in contemporary UK. 

Outcomes:
C - examine and discuss debates and social/political/moral factors to form an opinion on regulation
B - Analyse links to (WHY?) Effects Theories and consider Debates to support opinion
A - Justify changes in regulation effective in meeting
Starter: 
What does this Case Study reveal about social changes?
What Acts or legislation apply to this Case Study?
Would self-regulation of TV by the Producers have been more or less effective?
Is OFCOM too close to political interests?
Is it effective in protecting the vulnerable?

Was this discrimination - would this be accepted if the contributors were all an ethnic minority or women?




Questions to show progression:

http://www.ctklms.com/uploads/5/3/4/2/5342058/regulation_arguments.docx 
http://www.ctklms.com/uploads/5/3/4/2/5342058/regulation_previous_practices.docx

Mind Map out Social Changes/Debates from this Case Study

Sociological - the way society was/is organised and how we live our lives
Cultural and Political - religious, political beliefs, "norms" of behaviours, dominant ideas, who is in power/in charge, attitudes towards social groups

New Information
Case Study OFCOM and Benefit Street 2014 and Channel 4
What is the debate?

Plenary recap What are OFCOMs aims, regulatory practices, is it statutory or non?

What was controversial that let to complaints?
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/16/benefits-street-residents-apology-channel-4
What is the difference is representation of the story between the above 2 newspapers?

What is Poverty Porn & why do people think it is politically offensive propaganda?
https://rts.org.uk/article/rts-huw-wheldon-memorial-lecture
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2014/01/iain-duncan-smith-people-are-shocked-by-benefits-street-and-labour-will-thank-us-for-welfare-reform/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25287068

What is the publics response - group them into points of view (scroll through to find some interesting ones)
https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=%23benefitsstreet&src=typd




What action did the regulator take to the complaints and what was their decision?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-28086213
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/10935383/Benefits-Street-did-not-breach-Ofcom-guidelines-despite-complaints.html

How many complaints and what real harm could it have caused?
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/benefits-street-sparks-ofcom-probe-after-1800-complaints-9152654.html

What responsibility do the programme makers, the broadcaster, the regulator and we as a society have?
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb257/obb257.pdf 

AGP student Extension activity: read, annotate and summarise the theories of Stuart Hall (decoding preferred, negotiated, oppositional readings) and teach the class

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/22/benefits-street-tv-programme-divided-the-nation

Plenary - Post it notes: Where do you stand?





Prep: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2009/jan/13/class-discrimination-social-mobility 


  • What does this Case Study reveal about social changes?
  • What Acts or legislation apply to this Case Study?
  • Is OFCOM too close to political interests?
  • Is it effective in protecting the vulnerable?
  • Was this discrimination - would this be accepted if the contributors were all an ethnic minority or women?


STARTER: What do you believe ideology assessment game - what ideology are you?

No comments:

Post a Comment