To know about the theories and debates surrounding contemporary film
regulation
|
To justify your position supported with theoretical perspectives, and
a convincing concluding statement (win the debate)
|
To argue a given position in a debate on Film Regulation
|
To examine a range of theories on contemporary film regulation
|
To know about Film Regulation, the BBFC, Censorship and Restriction and
apply to contemporary examples
|
What Factors do the BBFC has to consider when rating a film
Link to Deadpool
What regulation would you advise?
A. Certificate - which
B. Censor - Cut or Ban?
Why - justify your reasons on wipeboards
New Info: Be clear on terms:
Regulation
Intervening in the production or consumption. State regulation laws ie (video recordings act). 2 ways to do this...
1) Classification
Restricting access on the grounds of age (BBFC films in cinema or home release)
2) CensorshipThe power to control what we are permitted to access (banning or cuts)
BBFC - Who are they?
Snuff Box BBFC 'by the few, for the masses' https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gytbhgHSENA
1:54 start
Factors the BBFC has to consider when rating a film:
Factors the BBFC has to consider when rating a film:
- Imitation - Newson Report (Jamie Bulger)
- Descrimination
- Context &Theme - artistic merit
- Tone & impact on its audience
- Violence
- Sex & sexual references,
- Drugs,
- Language
Create Meaning:
You are the BBFC officer - what certificate?
You are the BBFC officer - what certificate?
Batman Dark Knight Rises
Pulp fiction
This is England
Apply: feedback with large image of cert
Apply to demonstrate (Theoretical ways of thinking about censorship)
Task: Ways of thinking about censorship
Discuss the different viewpoints and ideas - what do you think each one means (use your resources to summarise)
Discuss the different viewpoints and ideas - what do you think each one means (use your resources to summarise)
Debate
"Is regulation (censorship or classification) still justified in contemporary culture?"
In your Teams Y & N, defend your given point of view with an argument
Yes
- Newson to protect vulnerable audiences young people are impressionable and may imitate or disassociate reality
- Controversial content can lead to desensitisation or a loss of moral norms, capacity for compassion
- Deregulation slippery slope by making content permissible we condone its place in society ie rape
- Film-makers have to keep pushing the boundaries of taste further to be controversial 'hype' HC2
No
- Adorno who is protecting who from what BBFC 'by the few, for the masses'
- Uses & Gratifications audience watch for a number of reasons ie catharsis
- Stuart Hall oppositional and negotiated readings
- Is regulation and restriction even possible anymore when content is online & global
- The context or intention of the message may justify the content
Recap: Concluding Statement
"Can we still protect the vulnerable in contemporary society, and is it the responsibility of a regulator to do so?"
Contemporary Media Regulation intro from Holly Taylor
Plenary Post it
Who
What from
Why
How
Whose responsibility?
Plenary Post it
Who
What from
Why
How
Whose responsibility?
No comments:
Post a Comment